From:
Robert Stevens <robert.stevens@law.ox.ac.uk>
To:
obligations@uwo.ca
Date:
28/06/2017 10:09:46 UTC
Subject:
New Flamenco
Important UKSC decision on mitigation/incidental benefits
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2017/43.html
I had thought the CA were right, but the UKSC clearly disagrees. Am a bit surprised, but I'm marking and haven't the time to think about it properly.
Views?
R